|
Creating Community Connections, Sociocultural Constructionism, and an Asset-Based Approach to Community Technology and Community Building Author: Randal Pinkett Dissertation School: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Pages: 325 Publication Date: February 2002 Availability: Access Number: 10748 Abstract: The intersection between community technology programs seeking to close the "digital divide," and community building efforts aimed as alleviating poverty, holds tremendous possibilities, as both domains seek to empower individuals and families, and improve their overall community. Ironically, approaches that combine these areas have received very little attention in theory and practice. As community technology and community building initiative move toward greater synergy, there is a great deal to be learned regarding how they can be mutually supportive, rather than mutually exclusive. This thesis sheds light on the possibilities inhered at this nexus. The project that constitutes the basis for this thesis is the Camfield Estates-MIT Creating Community Connections Project, an ongoing effort at Camfield Estates, a predominately African-American, low to moderate-income housing development. As part of this project, we worked with residents to establish a technological infrastructure by offering every family a new computer, software, and high speed Internet connection, along with comprehensive courses and web-based, community building system, the Creating Community Connections (C3) System, that I co-designed. The project combined these elements in an effort to achieve a social and cultural resonance that integrated both community technology and community building by leveraging indigenous assets instead of perceived needs. In relation to this work, I have developed the theoretical framework of sociocultural constructionism and an asset-based approach to community technology and community building. Through the lens, I examine the early results of the project in the areas of community social capital and community cultural capital, based on quantitative and qualitative data resulting from direct observation, surveys, interviews, sever logs, and case studies. These findings included expanded local ties, heightened awareness of community resources, improved communication and information flow at the development, and a positive shift in participants' attitudes and perceptions of themselves as learners. Finally, based on these and other findings, I discuss the challenges
and opportunities of a sociocultural constructionist and asset-based approach,
presents lessons learned, and offers recommendations for future community
technology and community building initiatives. |
|
|
Last updated: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 HUD USER Helpdesk P.O. Box 23268 Washington, DC 20026-3268 Toll Free: 1-800-245-2691 Fax: 1-202-708-9981 Email: oup@oup.org |
 |
Privacy Statement |
     |
